Showing posts with label Film Analysis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film Analysis. Show all posts

Saturday, 9 April 2016

The Tale of Demise FIRST CUT




This is the first cut of our sequence. There are improvements that need to be made, however. Once the the first cut was finished, we realized that re-sizing the ident was necessary to keep within the shot. Also, the addition of a frame that contains the film's title needs to be added.

  • The flashback scene could also benefit from some sound editing as the conversation is rather hard to hear.
  • We will also add credits for the opening as they are absent for this cut and we still need to decide on its order and position.

Adding the opening credits

The second cut of our sequence saw the addition of the opening credits. This included the actor's names (our group member's names and friends who have helped us) and appeared on screen while the opening was still playing. This was done in a way that the text was not overly intrusive to the opening, but still allowed the footage to play.

The writing was also kept small and did not have any distracting effects applied to keep attention on the sequence itself. This was done as we saw this very often on larger Horror/Thriller productions within the mapping sequence research. I noticed that small text was utilized when the opening requires the full attention of the audience, like ours does.

Thursday, 10 March 2016

Example of a Story Proposal

This is an example of a story proposal for a Thriller/Horror film like ours. The story proposal has to include:
  • The main point or moral of the story itself.
  • Who the story will be portrayed and focused around.
  • What the theme and atmosphere of the film will be. Humourous nightlife experiences? Fictional fairytale story? A violent, dramatic narrative?
  • How the film will be rated (BBFC) and its duration. Might be worth including distribution in addition (wide run, saturation, online, traditional marketing, etc)
  • What are the requirements of the actor’s character? What will they have to do to convincingly portray our narrator?


Premise: Never underestimate your potential enemies, all your actions have consequences.

Narrative: Michael Fedora, early 30s, currently unemployed with a previous career in organised crime. Escaped the clutches of his previous crime organisation after murdering his boss and living on his parents’ inheritance. He has now developed a pleasure and a talent for killing in different methods and the film is now focused on how Michael continues to wage war with his past criminal members and how he murders each member one by one with increasingly vicious methods. Works completely alone and is clearly unhinged throughout.

Theme: Michael Fedora’s psychotic behaviour means that while he is an expert at killing and he has the talent for covering his tracks during each murder, he does not consider every single angle such as police investigations, or the friends/family of his victims taking revenge which will eventually be his downfall.

Format: Full feature film, 1 hour 45 minutes, rated at 18 due to its violence and intensity. Trailer also created at two minutes with intended violence rather than full-feature gore so it can be viewed at many more placements (online, print adverts, etc).

Tone: The film is set in North London, within the very grimmest of settings to set a depressing, derelict scene for each murder (as if each victim has been `abandoned`). Criminal twist relates to films such as Run All Night and main protagonist relates to films such as American Psycho with a rather twisted manner and completely comfortable committing murders without hesitation. The film has a serious tone that will have the audience in shock with plot twists and extreme violence.

Character: An actor that can pull off the character of Michael Fedora with an unstable and unhinged mental state, show a clear pleasure for killing and someone who can maintain tension throughout the most important scenes such as murders or being questioned by police; or even gathering his thoughts and plans within his own household.   

Sunday, 31 January 2016

What I Have Learnt From Mapping Out Title Sequences

When mapping out three different title sequences of two action films and a drama, I have found that the number of credits usually ranges between 30 and 40 but it is surprisingly common for a large production to have only one or two credits which include the production/distribution companies and no mention of the main actors. The main actors are sometimes not mentioned presumably because they are already very well established and are instantly recognizable. I also found that when the anatagonist or protagonist is not as well established as other actors (e.g Transporter 2) there are more credits included in order to cement their presence in the film.

For our film opening, we will include approximately 11 credits which include:

2 to 3 for the production/distribution institutions
5 for the cast
4 for the director/screenplay etc

Institution
institution
cast
cast
cast
cast
other cast members (more than one name onscreen)
title
costume
producer
screenplay
director

The order may change within the post-production stage in order to reflect any changes we may have made within the film opening's production.

From the film mapping, I have gotten an idea of how these credits should appear on-screen and I now have an idea of how many credits should be used for our production. For the institutions, I noticed they were almost always included on-screen with an animation so I believe we could do the same with a GIF. Also, the text size varied much in size and effect, with everything from graphic matches and bold writing for each actor to simple, small text appearing in order to not dominate the opening. It all depended on the approach each opening was going for. Tense, vivid openings going for smaller texts and slow build-ups had larger texts that didn't interrupt any important scenes.

Our film opening will have both enigmas and tension that is important for the audience to see and a less intrusive style of credits will be included with smaller text size and no overly distracting effects on the text's font or entry on screen.




Film mapping for Need For Speed

Film Mapping for Need For Speed

Time: 0:00-0:58
EONE entertainment 0:00 - 0:13
dreamworks 0:20-0:23
reliance entertainment 0:24-0:30
EA 0:31-0:36
dreamworks pictures and reliance entertainment present 0:38-0:46
NEEDFORSPEED 0:48-0:58

Saturday, 30 January 2016

Film Mapping and Opening analysis for American Gangsta

Film mapping for American Gangsta

Time shown: 0:00 - 2:00
Twenty second Universal animation
Twenty second Imagine animation
Twenty second animation for Imagine icon
30 Second film opening, scene showing Frank Lucas (Denzel Washington) setting alight and then shooting an unknown character, in the presence of his mentor
AMERICAN GANGSTA (5 second zoom on text, black background, white text)
BASED ON A TRUE STORY (6 second zoom)
Graphic match from black, doors lifted as mentor from opening is seen in a juxtaposing scene giving away food to citizens
HARLEM - 1968 (1:55)


Film Mapping for American Gangsta

Within the opening to American Gangsta, there is violence being shown instantly on screen to cement the film’s genre and level of maturity from the beginning. It also opens up a large number of enigmas as we know nothing initially about the man being set alight or the people committing the act, or why. There is also a clear hierarchy of power between the two characters as they are clearly dressed differently and carry a slightly different attitude. One character (frank lucas)  performs the execution and is dressed casually in a Cardigan that does not appear especially powerful or commanding; while his mentor is dressed in a suit and tie,  accented by an overcoat and scarf that looks expensive and secures his higher status.

When this violent scene is paired with the sinister setting of an alleyway at night, the enigmas are even more profound. Even within the short thirty seconds we see, the audience gets the sense that no-one is coming for the victim and there are no witnesses. This also makes the victim seem a little insignificant as the character is not named at this point and maybe suggests that this execution is not critical to the storyline,  the most important aspect of this true story-based film.

After the aforementioned murder scene,  we see a totally juxtaposed image of the character dressed in a suit previously. Now he is giving away food (what appears to be Turkeys around Thanksgiving) and smiling brightly in the middle of dawn as citizens look upwards at him, begging for food. This is a powerful juxtaposition as not only has the time of day changed to perhaps represent two different personalities, but he looks completely unfazed by the actions he witnessed being performed (presumably) last night. Also, his level of power has not been adjusted here as others are begging from him and there is no-one yet positioned above him on the hierarchy. His proxemics also place him above every other visible character as he is standing on the back of a van, giving even further levels of power and control.

Finally, this is the only scene within the opening that gives a sense of time chronologically; not only by the text appearing on screen (Harlem 1968) but by mise-en-scene. Props in particular play a part here as they are clearly from a certain era: the buses, cars, surrounding shops, street signs etc all represent the late 1960’s that the film is placed.





Film Mapping and Opening analysis for Transporter 2

Film Mapping for Transporter 2

time in minutes when credits are shown 0:00-2:00
20th Century Fox logo (signature 20 second animation)
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX presents
a EUROPACORP production        in coproduction with TF1 FILMS PRODUCTION
in association with CURRENT ENTERTAINMENT
with the participation of CANAL+         and TPS STAR
JASON STATHAM
ALESSANDRO GASSMAN
AMBER VALLETTA
and KATE NAUTA
with MATTHEW MODINE
and JASON FLEMING
TRANSPORTER 2 (film title)

time in minutes when credits are shown 3:30-6:30
KEITH DAVID
introducing HUNTER CLARY
SHANNON BRIGGS
and FRANCOIS BERLEAND
casting by ED ARENAS    MELISSA HIRSCHENSON
costume designer BOBBIE READ
original score by ALEXANDRE AZARIA
martial arts choreographer CORY YUEN
car stunt choreographer MICHEL JULIENNE
editors CHRISTINE LUCAS-NAVARRO    VINCENT TABAILLON
production designer JOHN MARK HARRINGTON
director of photography MITCHELL AMUNDSEN
executive producer TERRY MILLER
produced by LUC BESSON and STEVEN CHASMAN
based on characters created by LUC BESSON & ROBERT MARK KAMEN
written by LUC BESSON & ROBERT MARK KAMEN
directed by LOUIS LETERRIER




Film Opening Analysis for Transporter 2 

The first thing that is made apparent within this film’s opening is that it begins in a very similar manner to the first instalment. We initially see an extreme long shot of a black german saloon car sitting still within a car park at which point the camera will pan across to the left and zoom towards the vehicle, before cutting to a close up of the side profile of the vehicle and continuing to pan across until an extreme long shot of the Audi logo on the front grille is visible.

The first Transporter instalment (featuring the same protagonist) had a film opening that was almost identical to this one apart from driving a BMW rather than an Audi. I suspect the vehicle choice was a matter of advertising for the manufacturer in question as they get to feature their high end luxury vehicles in a high-grossing box office film.

Another thing worth noting is that the original film’s opening eventually lead to the preparation of a bank robbery and a very memorable car chase. The fact that the second film begins the same way would perhaps lead us to suggest many more scenes as memorable and action-packed as the first.

As for the protagonist himself (Jason Statham playing as Frank Martin, unnamed at the film opening), he appears to carry himself with discretion, looks totally in control and an aura of formality given off by his black suit and choice of vehicle. An example of the character’s relative calmness and control is that within two minutes of the film’s starting, he is already threatened by an amateur car-jacking. A gun is pointed at him initially and he is threatened with melee weapons when he refuses to unlock the car’s coded ignition for the carjackers. He never looks frightened, anxious or even slightly concerned about losing a then brand-new car. He takes the whole situation as if it is a minor irritation before disarming the thugs of their weapons without permanently harming them; showing us that he has a touch of empathy as he could have easily killed them for the threats and inconvenience, and more importantly, the brief fighting scene reminds us in abundance that this is an action film through and through, and the genre is clearly confirmed within the space of three and a half minutes.    


Saturday, 23 January 2016

Preliminary task storyboard




This is the storyboard for our preliminary task. It includes the length of each shot with a brief description of what is included too. Most shots included movement in order to cover the main stipulations if the prelim task (walking through a door, meeting someone for a conversation, etc) and these are all listed.